United Reformed Churches in North America · URCNA Study Committee Report (1997).
Summary
Five Ontario church councils wrote this study report after a 1993 overture from Dunnville complained that divergent readings of Scripture had left the young federation without a unified approach to diaconal work; Synod St. Catharines commended it to the URCNA churches in 1997. The committee grounds the office in creation and in Christ the Servant, distills the diaconal mandate into the four points quoted below, and concludes that Scripture does not allow women deacons.
A historical survey traces the office from its early decline into a stepping stone to the priesthood through Calvin’s recovery of it in Geneva, and a comparison of the 1914 Christian Reformed and 1995 Canadian Reformed church orders shows the deacon’s task broadening from poor relief to promoting the communion of the saints.
The practical counsel is pointed: deacons belong at monthly council meetings, their task is local rather than global relief, and assigning them the church’s budget and administration damages their real ministry.
Excerpt
Since the Scriptures do not provide any other concrete revelation about the general task of the deacons, we conclude that the Word of God teaches that the mandate for the diaconate contains these ingredients as normative:
Browse by Topic · Browse by Author
Feedback, questions, or recommended resources?
More from Tim Hopper: readmachen.com · reformedconfessions.com · ulsterworldly.com
Maintained since 2015 · last updated 2026
Copyright © 2026
Header photo of Second Presbyterian Church in Charleston, South Carolina.